AI Cheating at Princeton: Who's Really at Fault? | Episode 80

Princeton University just did something that hasn't happened in over 133 years — they scrapped their honor code. Why? Students got caught using AI to cheat on exams. But the real question is… who's actually at fault?

In this episode, Q.B. and Tiffany break down the Princeton AI cheating scandal from every angle — the institution's failure to adapt, the no-snitch culture, doxxing fears, and what schools SHOULD be doing in 2026 to stay ahead of technology instead of reacting to it.

🕐 TIMESTAMPS
0:00 — Intro | Welcome to Think Successfully Roomed + Gas Prices Talk
3:42 — Princeton's AI Cheating Scandal Breaks Down — Tiffany's First Take
7:37 — Who's Really at Fault? Accountability on Both Sides
11:02 — Should Schools Confiscate Phones? Trust vs. Distrust Debate
14:06 — There's an Order to Managing Change — Princeton Skipped Steps
18:03 — Why Students Wouldn't Snitch: Social Media, Doxxing & Safety
22:03 — A Century of Tradition Wiped Out Over 30% of a Survey
26:30 — Final Thoughts: The Real Problem Is the Human Element, Not AI
28:38 — QB's Proposal: Structured AI Access During Exams
32:00 — 🔥 Tiffany's Big Idea: Princeton Builds Its OWN AI Testing System
33:00 — Outro | Subscribe, Follow & Think Successfully

🔔 SUBSCRIBE so you never miss an episode 
📲 Follow QB on IG → [ https://www.instagram.com/_think.successfully ]
📲 Follow Tiffany on IG → [ https://www.instagram.com/ms_tiffany_ingram ]

#AI #ChatGPT #Princeton #HonorCode #ArtificialIntelligence #ThinkSuccessfullyRoom  #Education #Podcast #TechTalk #Mindset #College
--
Business Inquires:
Email: ithinksuccessfully@gmail.com

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:16

Man, welcome back to another episode of The Think Successfully Roamed. This is the platform where we focus on better mindsets. We build in character, bringing value to both you and your people. I'm your host, QB So F and Amazing. This is Tiffany Ingram. And together we talk about the evolution of technology, which we all know is artificial intelligence. Tiff, how you feeling?

SPEAKER_01 0:40

Really good. Really good. Really, really good.

SPEAKER_00 0:43

That's good to hear. That's definitely good to hear. Especially with the I'm trying to get through these gas prices.

SPEAKER_01 0:50

Chao.

SPEAKER_00 0:54

You know, I'm stuttering and shit. I can't, I can't, I can't even sit here and imagine. Like, it's crazy. I don't even want to go nowhere unless I absolutely have to. Like, gas prices are so crazy right now. And I just feel right now, we're gonna get into our AI thing, but right now, managing your money is is you know, that's a powerful thing right now. That's a huge thing right now because gas prices is is I never seen it this high in our area. You know what I'm saying? So you being able to rebalance your money and reallocate things and and cut things from over here to be able to, you know, put more money towards gas, you know, that's a powerful thing right now. So you you gotta get to it. But besides that, Tiff, um, yeah, we we we uh talked about a situation at Stanford. Uh no, Princeton, uh what was the name? Princeton. Princeton University. Princeton University. So I'm gonna try to I'm gonna try to, you know, create some type of scene for the audience, right? So imagine if we are in like this packed just hallway, right? It's it's the year of 1893. Students are in this hallway, you know, uh final exam is happening, and and the the teachers, the the professors, they they do something crazy. They leave a they lead the exam area and leave students by themselves, and um there's nowhere one to oversee the environment, to monitor uh misconduct or anything. They leave that in the students' hands, right? Because that's just the code of the school, right? Um, so for 133 years, that was Princeton's way. You know, they they didn't, you know, because this is an Ivy League school, right? So they they trust their kids enough to not uh uh cheat on exams or tests, right? So it's you know it's something that they pledge to. Like, look, if you find or or notice another student is cheating, you know, that's your responsibility to tail on that student. Um so now here we are in in 2026, and we're in a different time, you know, as far as technology, right? So there was an incident at uh at Princeton University where the children were utilizing uh artificial intelligence, you know, like ChatGPT, you know, to cheat on these exams, right? And they pretty much broke uh, you know, uh a code that's been in play for the for the for the last 133 years. So what's what's your thoughts on, you know, what used to be and what's now transitioned to to technology? And do you feel like the kids are at fault or do the the should the faculty have done something differently in that situation?

Princeton's AI Cheating Scandal Breaks Down

SPEAKER_01 3:58

I think with so initially when I read this article, you know, there were a couple things that were that were that caught my attention. Um but I will say initially what I thought was in a over 133-year time span, you haven't updated your process. Guess what? It's not just AI. We said before that AI just amplified the gaps in anything. And this is a this is a case in point where that's happening, and I think because they haven't updated it, now you have this massive disruption or technology disruption that I don't think they really sat down and told the kids here are our expectations with AI. And I think that's across a lot of organizations or educational institutions. Um, they're not explaining how AI can and can't be used and even updating their overall honor system.

unknown 5:08

Updating their overall honor system.

SPEAKER_01 5:09

Because that's what they call it, right? Uh the honor system.

unknown 5:12

Right.

SPEAKER_00 5:13

Yeah. I think um I think in that situation, you know, like like you said, you know, the past 133 years, I feel like as as a faculty, um y'all should have been keeping up with the times, you know. Now, I'm not saying the students are right for cheating, yeah, but at the same time, y'all probably should have been keeping up with the times and and and understand that, you know, being able to cheat now is is hard to catch. You know, like back then, you know, when we was in school, you know, you it was some effort into cheating. You know, you had to, you know, you had to, you know, write your shit down on a piece of paper. Maybe if you you had a buddy that was in on it, y'all had some bird calls, or you know what I'm saying? It was something to signal, like, look, this is the answer. Yeah. It was some effort behind that, but now it's more discreet because we have sell your devices, right? And on those sell your devices, we have Gemini, we have uh ChatGPT, we have Claude, we have Grok. And all of these, all of these AI tools are capable within just a few clicks, you know, providing you with the answers that you're looking for. You know, so if that was a concern, in order to protect uh the honor code, you know, that's been there for 133 years, y'all, y'all probably should have confiscated those sell your devices with that in mind, um, of how as accessible AI is, you know what I'm saying, to make that environment more strict. And and the fact that, you know, Princeton is a is an Ivy League school, right? I I honestly believe that they probably wasn't cheating because they needed to cheat. They they probably just wanted to speed up the process. You know, um could be. Yeah, and and and just make it get through the test faster, you you know, um, at least that's what I was thinking of. Um now, what they should have caught was it was a, I guess it was a at some time during the exam test, everybody was lining up for the bathroom, you know. So it y'all had to, y'all had the something had to go in y'all's mind. Like, how what's the chances of all of these people needing to run to the restroom at the same time, you know? So that that should have been a red flag right there, uh as far as what was going on. Um so yeah, as far as as far as that, Tiv, do you think uh like the with the faculty, like in that in that particular situation, as far as that with the uh do you feel like the the kids are at fault for for cheating or like what what what's your thoughts on

Who's Really at Fault? Accountability on Both Sides

SPEAKER_00 7:53

that?

SPEAKER_01 7:53

Well, I think there again, there's some accountability on on both sides. And I'm gonna go back a little bit and I'll come back to this. You know, if you know AI is coming and was here, right? And it's going to change um how students learn and and how they they arrive at the answer, right? So I would have even said, hey, a lot of these educational institutions need to think of ways to cat or utilize and leverage AI to really understand or predict a student's um behavior in the uh application phase, right? So if I was president and how can I build and really assess a student's ability to follow the rules, right? If the honor code is something that we we uh hold near and dear to our hearts, how can we measure your aptitude to follow it when nobody's watching? Right, right, because if students are using it and leveraging it to get to the answer, educational institutions now have to think outside the box to say, okay, how do we ensure that we get the um students that will follow the culture into our into our educational institutions? Does that make sense? Right? Because businesses use AI to do personality assessments and all of these other things. There may need to be a component added to again the assessment phase when students are coming on, right? Because another part of this article is that students were afraid to report people being uh people cheating because there's this no snitch mentality. Um, even in an institution or or organization where, hey, for 130, 130, 133 years, we have been doing this, right? My father's father's father, these kids know and understand Princeton's rules. So to come in there and think that, hey, I can uh you know negate what's been set for again decades and upon decades, that's a different thought pattern. And maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place. So your selection criteria or selection process needs to be updated. So I would think, you know, upstream a little bit, what can we do to ensure that again, we're getting people in our organization that will follow our cultural rules, or they're accepting accepting the fact that, hey, I may need to change in order to be here before you the actual incident itself. So what what um proactiveness can you take on before you get to a situation where a student is even allowed to cheat or allowed the opportunity to cheat? That shouldn't have even been uh a thought, really.

SPEAKER_00 11:14

Yeah, that that should have been like I said, that's something

Should Schools Confiscate Phones? Trust vs. Distrust Debate

SPEAKER_00 11:18

like you said, the the the uh the system should have been updating. You know what I'm saying? Before y'all probably wasn't confiscating certain things, you know. And in my opinion, you know, look, we in the day in 2026, technology is prevalent, AI survives on sell your devices now. Maybe we need to update our system to take away certain devices during exam time, still giving them, still giving them the floor to monitor each other just without sell your devices.

SPEAKER_01 11:49

Um and I think I I think that could have I seen you think until you got something with you Well, it's because you you're saying a thing is like confiscate their devices. I'm talking about trust versus mistrust or distrust, right? Yeah. If I trust you to do the right thing, right, we're all told at some point in time by our parents, by our parents, but I'm gonna say this by good parents, because your parents will tell you, do the right thing even when nobody's looking.

SPEAKER_00 12:17

Right, right.

SPEAKER_01 12:18

You know what I mean? Okay, so so you can use a culture like that, why I can have my phone in my pocket. It's like you're treating me like I'm a child.

unknown 12:28

Like I'm a child.

SPEAKER_00 12:30

I was just gonna be my fault for cutting you off, Tiff. I wanted to uh make sure I was understanding. So you saying y'all trusted me enough to accept me in this school, so trust me enough to keep my cellular device.

SPEAKER_01 12:42

Yeah, it should be. But I'm saying the thing, the the the the parameters should be set to where when I was in the military, right? We we had a system where I was responsible to for the person to my left or to my right. It wasn't just about me, right? Even if I didn't like you, I'm responsible for you. I felt that. So if you were messing up, we were all gonna get in trouble. And so it's kind of like that's the culture that they had, and somewhere along the way, it wasn't just AI showing up. They lost that, right? It's about trusting and not trusting, it's about organizations being clear on what's acceptable, what's not, and then holding people accountable. Like it's it's a certain order of things. I'm actually wondering, did Preston even take the time to say, okay, here's how AI, we're gonna be proactive. Here's how AI can and will disrupt our our educational institution. What do we need to do to prepare for that? Does that make sense?

unknown 13:52

That makes sense.

SPEAKER_00 13:53

Yeah, my fault, Tiff. The uh, I'm sure the audio probably still came in when we, but that whole, I want to say the last maybe 10 seconds or so, I couldn't hear it on my end. But we're gonna keep, we're gonna keep that. It it probably still caught it. Um hopefully it didn't. Our apologies for the for the difficulties, y'all. But yeah, if you wanna, if you don't mind, say if that lasts maybe the last 10, 15 seconds of what you said.

SPEAKER_01 14:22

Okay.

There's an Order to Managing Change — Princeton Skipped Steps

SPEAKER_01 14:22

So what I was just saying, like there's an order to managing change, right? We all know that. It's before I get to the actual test day, there's some preparation. So Princeton should have said, okay, how is AI? You know, I know AI is changing. We're all in this this new environment, but how do we predict AI is going to change the way students learn and the way we teach and the culture that we have that governs how our students should act, right? Then communicate that. Right? So we have things built in our our um our acceptance uh process. Now you come on on campus, hey, this is how AI can be used, this is how it can't. And if you violate that, right, our honor code is still in place. This is what's going to happen.

SPEAKER_00 15:17

Yeah, and and I think, and I think instead of just tearing down, you know, an honor code that's been there for over a century, you know, really, really, like you said, some things just could have been done differently. Even if that means, you know, meetings or, you know, whether that's beatings with the faculty, whether that's emails being sent out to the kids, maybe once every every quarter, you know, somebody, y'all have somebody that's that's in charge of keeping up with the times, technology, keeping up with the changes, and y'all just keep everybody informed. Like, look, this is what's going on in the world now, and we, you know, we have to set some guidelines in play in order, you know what I'm saying? You especially by us trusting you as part of this this Princeton family, this Princeton University family, we trust that you're going to do the right thing. But this is what's happening in the world now, and we would appreciate it if this didn't didn't tamper with uh uh the the the tradition of of Princeton University. So yeah, that that could have been an option, definitely, instead of just saying, you know what, 133 years, we're we're just gonna get rid of the uh the honor code.

SPEAKER_02 16:30

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00 16:31

And because because uh to me, that's saying you don't trust your you don't trust your children if you just sit here and just get rid of it. How about just just doing a better job at keeping up with the times to to make sure that it don't happen again and and just trust that you know that the children want to be there, the kids want to be there enough to do the right thing, you know.

SPEAKER_01 16:52

So or you don't trust your process, right? So it's like the organization, the the educational institution, you allow, like again, kids go through, I fill out the application, I do essays, videos, whatever the case may be, and you say, Yep, and you are the one, you're accepted into president. But there has to be a flaw in your process if you're not capturing that behavioral component, right? So instead of saying addressing the problem, you're addressing it by saying, Okay, well, we're gonna go to the other end of the extreme. You're missing an opportunity to teach a child or to teach a young adult a good lesson of again being a trustworthy person.

SPEAKER_00 17:41

Yeah, and and I mean they they pledge against that too. Like after after every exam or after every test, you know, their their words is, you know, they handwrite, I pledge my honor that I have not violated the honor code during this examination. You know what I'm saying? So you have to you have to trust that your kids wouldn't go against that, you know what I'm saying? So my thing is if they did use AI, it ain't no reason why they should be handwriting that. You know what I'm saying? But the fact that they have to do that after every exam, you should have some type of trust in in in you know in what's being built at uh at Princeton University. Um

Why Students Wouldn't Snitch: Social Media, Doxxing & Safety

SPEAKER_00 18:19

I wanted to go back towards uh what you said about the social media thing, right? A lot of people don't understand uh the pressure of that, you know. I know I know I have made a promise as a as a peer to my peers to, you know, uh if I catch any misconduct to to report that. But, you know, everything isn't just discreet no more, you know what I'm saying? Like if if if somebody if somebody found out oh yeah, somebody told on you, they gonna know exactly who, you know, they gonna know eventually that they they're going to know exactly who who snitched on them, right? And then now you have social media platforms, Facebook, uh, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, whatever, and now, you know, next thing you know, they're they're going on those social media platforms and and dragging their name in the mud, slamming them on social networks, and possibly creating a bad reputation for them. So it's not like they they don't want to say anything. They just want they just don't want to deal with the pressure that the faculty wouldn't have to deal with.

unknown 19:30

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00 19:30

You know what I'm saying? So that's something we have to keep in mind too. Um, you know, so it's a reason why, you know, when you look at the data, you know, 40% or more, you witness somebody cheating, they just chose not to say nothing specifically because of that.

SPEAKER_01 19:46

There was a term that that article used um called doxing or something. And I'm like, what is that?

SPEAKER_00 19:53

You know, that term look for that term does sound familiar. I I came across it probably once.

SPEAKER_01 19:58

And so in that particular article, because they said people or kids were uh young adults were scared to come forth because again, the the no-snitch uh uh culture and just being um doxed is doxing and then being bullied. And I was like, okay, what's doxing? And so what I found was that again, and we've seen it when a person is is getting doxed, that means that you're not only bullying them on social media, you're like revealing personal information about them, like you know, without their consent. So, like my license plate, my where I work, where I live, even. And so, you know, we've seen people take these things a little bit too far, right? You know, you have people outside your house, you have people stalking you, you have, you know, just all kind of behavior going on. And so it's now it's a safety concern. And a lot of these students are like, I don't want those problems. Being in college is enough for me. I don't have time to get harassed, or again, people just showing up doing things that'll put my safety um at risk. Now, here's the other parts of that article that I found a little bit interesting, interesting, where there were students that actually confirmed that they had used AI and cheated. So I wanted to cheat. And why would I tell somebody? Why would I tell a survey that's being that was being uh, because I think the information can't be a survey. From from a survey, and you had the students that said 30%. So that means the rest of the students, the majority of students, either decided not to admit or they're not actually cheating. So now if we look at the statistics for the smaller population of your you changed a um a culture, cultural norm for 30% of your population that you survey.

SPEAKER_00 22:12

Yeah. And um, and I I feel like That was unnecessary just because of the history that was

A Century of Tradition Wiped Out Over 30% of a Survey

SPEAKER_00 22:19

there. You know what I'm saying? I mean, a century, over a century, that's that's a long, that's a long time to hold on. Like to have a system, and that's how the system have been done.

SPEAKER_02 22:32

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00 22:32

Um, you know, for the for the past, you know, 133 years, you know, and going back to what we said, all only thing that had to be done was some things had to change with y'all's system. Y'all just had to adjust with the times. That's that's it. You know what I'm saying? Instead of just saying, you know what, because that's and the only reason I keep like pointing at that is because that's a lot of time. Yeah. Like holding on to a tradition. And in one in one incident, or I'm not gonna say maybe it was multiple incidents, but like you said, Tiv at 30%. I don't feel like that was enough to say, you know what, we're just gonna, you know, forget about this tradition, and and for now, we're just gonna have teachers in the exam room monitoring and taking notes of misconduct. You know, and and and some people would even argue that having people in the exam room is actually a gift, you know, because now uh uh the the young adult isn't responsible for uh keeping an eye on someone else, plus trying to do good on this exam. You know what I'm saying? So now by there being someone in the space, they don't have to worry about paying attention to somebody and being on the edge of should I till, should I not till? Yeah. And they could just focus 100% on what they have to do to pass that exam. So do you do you feel like that's do you feel like they could have kept that tradition and just had people in there? Well, nah, because that was part of the tradition was not having people in there with them. But do you feel like that's possibly a gift by them just having, you know what I'm saying, people in there now, currently, you know what I'm saying, to to monitor the kids?

SPEAKER_01 24:16

Yeah, it takes that, it takes that pressure off of like literally you've stripped the the authority away from the students to or the the I would say the not authority, the responsibility. And so again, I'm just gonna focus on me and passing this exam. But one thing that this did, this whole overall story did, um, cause me to think on the other end of the spectrum was was this the first time that something like this happened? Meaning, has the honor system always been so honorable? Right. Because AI is just an extension of again some of the technological advancements that we've had through over the years, right? Did they ban calculators? Right? Did they ban the internet? Right? There's some things that again you can have more control over, but but I'm just wondering, like, wondering, like, has this honor system always been great?

SPEAKER_00 25:28

Yeah, been been always been honored, you know what I'm saying? Has it always been perfect? So you mean to tell me this this up until now? Nobody has ever cheated in over a century. No, that's that's something to think about. You know, uh now it is, I forgot the name of the schools. I think Duke was one of them. And I think uh what it was another one that had implemented these changes or implemented some changes maybe two, three years ago. And Princeton just now are implementing changes. Now, they didn't say anything. I'm not sure if those particular schools have traditions that have been done for for years, you know, uh prior to AI, but they did make changes in, you know, uh uh two, three years ago, and Princeton just now starting to make that change because of this incident. But also we got to keep in mind too is that sometimes that's just a moral or or principle code of just some individuals to not tell on somebody else. You know what I'm saying? I know I was raised like that. You know what I'm saying? Like, uh oh boy, stop telling. You know what I'm saying? That's just how I was brought up. So that's how I know. Like, shit, if I was in Princeton and I seen somebody, man, hey, do you, man? Shit, you you know, I I can't really,

Final Thoughts: The Real Problem Is the Human Element, Not AI

SPEAKER_00 26:46

but that's some, that's just a moral and sometimes a principle that people that people live by. Um, so yeah, Tiff, I think, I think all in all, you know, if you have final thoughts for this subject, like what like what would be your final thoughts like closing out on this this Princeton University cheating situation?

SPEAKER_01 27:10

I think that we're starting to see um a bigger issue as it pertains to AI, right? And the bigger issue um literally isn't about the the technology itself, it's the human the human element and really understanding with clarity when it's appropriate and when it's not appropriate to use. Um, we're still trying to flush that out because in school, you know, the educational institutions want to teach the information, um, prepare the students, but students are finishing college and not being able to find a job because organizations or companies on the other end are in a rush or in a race to integrate AI, right? So there seems to be a disconnect with that and really understanding when is it appropriate to use it and making sure that the educational institutions are developing adults that are ready for the workforce.

SPEAKER_00 28:26

You know what, Tip, before we close out, what you what you feel about this idea, right? Because, you know, I I you know, as we always say, AI is something everybody should implement. You know, I you know, realistically though, um, you should always talk to AI, uh conversate with AI so it can get to know you as a person. Uh, and then most most importantly, you should be cu uh creating some type of systems with the artificial intelligence that's available. Um

QB's Proposal: Structured AI Access During Exams

SPEAKER_00 28:54

now, what if, you know, maybe uh it was a proposal, what if they propose this? Like, look, okay, we understand AI is prevalent in in the year of 2026, right? And we realize that we can't stop our students from utilizing the technology, right? So what if during their testing, right, they give, you know, maybe three to five chances. Say like it's a question that that's very difficult, and they can't, they they feel like they know the answer, but maybe they need they need a second opinion or something, and they have the option to to to you know go to Chat GPT, maybe Gemini, whatever, and and and ask Chat GPT, or at least talk to it enough uh uh as far as getting that answer as far as I'm trying to I'm trying to see if they will have certain prompts to where it's not necessarily giving them the answer, but helping them, but helping them solve that problem, but figuring out a way where they can use it, you know, a certain amount of times during their exam to help with certain problems. Do you think that could be Yeah?

SPEAKER_01 30:05

I would say they would have to articulate the idea first. So you have to show proof that you understand whatever the concept is. So it's not, hey, what's the answer to A, B, C, D?

SPEAKER_00 30:18

Right, right, yeah, exactly.

SPEAKER_01 30:19

How should I articulate this? Here's the question, here's what I'm thinking the answer is based upon right, what I read here, here, here, here, here, and the notes that I've taken, right?

SPEAKER_02 30:31

Right.

SPEAKER_01 30:31

So they have to prove, it's like proof of concept. They have to prove they have some conceptual understanding of what's being asked of them. I would say in that instance, you're not just asking it for a shortcut, you're giving it something to work with and say, hey, you know, how can I enhance my answer to um to really show what um like based upon strictly based upon the information that I fed you, right? So you can't, you can't, you have to give it something to work with, but it's only going to work with what you give it and not go externally.

SPEAKER_00 31:14

Yeah, like it's it's making you work, like it's helping you brainstorm, but making you work for the answer instead of just giving it to you. You know what I'm saying?

SPEAKER_01 31:21

So also helping students to to use that as a brainstorming tool and not just a quick answer. Hey, what's the thing to do?

SPEAKER_00 31:29

Yeah, yeah. Yeah, like how you would use a calculator, yeah, two plus two. Yeah, yeah, four. No, we're not doing that. Like, yeah, we're giving y'all the option to utilize AI simply because we understand that it's you can't avoid it. But the caveat is you can't just ask the AI, what's the answer to this? Bounce off of each other. You you throw in an idea, the AI throw you an idea back and forth until you brainstorm enough to where you come up with your answer. And I think that would be I think that would be a solid system. You know what I'm saying? Instead of them sneaking off using it, they have the opportunity to use it, but it but instead it's gonna act like a brainstorming partner to help you get through that particular question.

SPEAKER_01 32:15

And what

Princeton Builds Its OWN AI Testing System

SPEAKER_01 32:16

if Princeton developed their own AI system where all the test answers were fed into this system? You have students that sit down and they spar with, not spar, but hey, the computer asks you a question, you give it an answer based upon again, you have to provide the context.

SPEAKER_00 32:36

Mm-hmm. You know what I mean? That's that that's fire. That's fire. You know what I'm saying? Is it's forcing you to think and not just giving it to you. Because I I think that'd be the downfall for real. Is that I feel like that's the only way AI can really dumb you down is when you you you don't really use it as a partner in this thing. It's just a quick, yeah, it's just a machine to you where you can get a quick answer and you don't really think for real. So that that system is actually fired, Tiff. I like that. So yeah, uh man, I was uh this this conversation I felt was I looked at it, I'm like, okay, this this could be interesting, you know. Let's let's talk about this. But I'm excited, uh, I'm excited to see the response from this, uh, the feedback from the people. So um make sure y'all follow Tiff, make sure y'all follow myself. Um IG links are in the description. Make sure you uh subscribe to the YouTube channel so that you can be notified on future content. And as always, y'all, as long as we see support, we will continue to keep creating the content. Um on top of the technology is just something that we have to be updated on. So it gives us a job to be able to provide that for y'all. So uh without that being said, y'all, life is good, life is wonderful. Be blessed to be alive, self sufficiency is how you survive. To the kings and queens, to the gods and goddess forever and always. Thanks successfully, excellent.